点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
海外华媒聚焦中共二十大：为世界读懂新时代中国增添注脚******
(中共二十大·声音)海外华媒聚焦中共二十大：为世界读懂新时代中国增添注脚
中新社北京10月18日电 题：海外华媒聚焦中共二十大：为世界读懂新时代中国增添注脚
作者 金旭 徐文欣
中国进入“二十大时间”。在会场内外，活跃着海外华文媒体的身影，他们见证中国发展的重要时刻，认真践行华媒人担当，全力以赴让世界看到新时代的中国。
凝“新”聚力传侨音
现场报道中共二十大，加拿大共生国际传媒社长胡宪感叹每天都充满新鲜感。
在筹备报道初期，胡宪特意对居住在蒙特利尔的读者进行了调查。“我们带着海外民众和侨胞的关注‘有备而来’，会以实事求是的态度报道中国全貌，回应侨胞关切，解答侨胞疑惑。”
全国832个贫困县全部摘帽、近1亿农村贫困人口实现脱贫、国内生产总值增长到114万亿元人民币……这些密密麻麻的数字被胡宪记在随身携带的本子上。“中国共产党带领中国人民完成了从贫穷到小康的跨越，向着民族复兴前进的步伐坚定且从容，这些具体详实的事例是中国故事最充实的范本。”她说。
10月16日，中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会在北京人民大会堂隆重开幕。 中新社记者 盛佳鹏 摄携手同行赴盛会
罗马尼亚《欧洲侨报》社长高进向记者展示了境外媒体记者采访申请系统，他说：“5年前我全程参与中共十九大的报道，如今这种熟悉感又回来了。新闻中心对时间的精准把握为媒体省去很多等待时间，各个环节无缝衔接，为中外记者采访提供了便捷的服务。”
《欧洲侨报》及相关网站计划发布逾百篇大会报道。高进称，“不管是前方记者，还是后方编辑，大家都希望抢抓热点，第一时间把二十大报告中的亮点、重点呈现给心系祖(籍)国的华侨华人。”
“在大会开始前，我们推出《迎接“二十大”，圣彼得堡中国留学生有话说》等预热稿件。”俄罗斯《龙报》社长李双杰深感，中国年轻一代对中共二十大的关注表明他们早已将深厚的家国情怀融入个人的远大理想与抱负之中。“第二个百年发展目标如何实现？国家统一如何推进？更加鲜活生动的中国形象如何展现？这些都是海外侨胞尤其是新生代最关心的话题。”
5年后再次近距离报道中共党代会，李双杰相信，所有人都得到了期盼已久的答案：中国发展未来可期。
此次参会，意大利《欧华联合时报》社长吴敏聚焦中国对外开放方面的积极举措。他表示，中国加大对外开放的力度和决心能给海外侨胞带来更多的发展空间与合作机遇。
“云”上添花同参与
一些未能到达现场的海外华文媒体开启“云报道”模式，积极向世界传递中国声音。
瑞士欧亚时报社社长朱爱莲告诉记者，“云参会”能充分发挥融媒体报道的优势。“我们成立了中共二十大专题工作组，目前正邀请知名欧洲专家学者解读二十大报告，力求多角度、全方位深度聚焦中国智慧和中国方案对世界的启发和贡献。”
“随着中国影响力的提升，越来越多的国家想要读懂中国。”朱爱莲表示，回顾过去十年的奋进历程，中国的发展成就令人印象深刻，中国治理经验值得借鉴，中共二十大的召开无疑让世界对中国的高质量发展更有信心。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)